Crimson Desert's rating is surprising and divides critics' opinions
Check out the variation in scores!
Crimson Desert's rating began to attract attention as soon as reviews started to emerge, revealing a very divided scenario among specialized media outlets. The Pearl Abyss title arrived on the market surrounded by expectation, but the reviews show differing opinions on its concept, performance, and execution.

While some websites highlight the project's ambition, others point out flaws that impact the overall perception. Even with the launch happening now, dozens of reviews have already been published, forming an average that reflects exactly this division.
There is praise for the scale, the combat, and the freedom presented, but also criticism related to the narrative and system design. See below!
What is Crimson Desert's score on Metacritic?

Looking directly at Metacritic, Crimson Desert has an average score of 78 on the PC version, based on 85 reviews from the international press. This number places the game in a positive range, but still far from consensus. The evaluation shows that, despite the praise, there is a significant amount of criticism pulling the average down.
It's also worth mentioning the variation in reviews. Crimson Desert's rating isn't stable, and this becomes clear when you look at the extremes: there are very high scores, but also very low ratings.
What was praised?
Some media outlets highlighted the level of challenge and combat. There are reviews that mention the need for patience and precision, comparing the game to well-known titles in the genre.
There is also praise for the size of the map and the number of activities available. This reinforces the idea of an ambitious project, something that directly and positively influences Crimson Desert's rating.
And the criticism?
On the other hand, not everything was well-received. One of the most cited points is the narrative, which some outlets consider unclear or lacking depth. Furthermore, there are comments about systems that don't function as well as they should. Not to mention the inconsistency.
Full list of grades
To better understand this difference, it's worth looking directly at the grades assigned:
Maximum scores
- Gameliner — 100
- Gamers Heroes — 100
- The Outerhaven — 100
- Vice — 100
Very high marks
- Forbes — 95
- DualShockers — 95
High marks
- ComicBook — 90
- Hardcore Gamer — 90
- Windows Central — 90
- LevelUp — 90
Good grades
- Destructoid — 85
- IGN Brazil — 85
- COGconnected — 84
Positive average scores
- GamesRadar+ — 80
- GAMINGbible — 80
- GamingBolt — 80
- Game Rant — 80
- PC Gamer — 80
- Voxel — 78
Intermediate grades
- PC Games — 75
- CG Magazine — 70
- Game Informer — 70
- GameSpot — 70
- Insider Gaming — 70
- Screen Rant — 70
- The Gamer — 70
Low grades
- PCGamesN — 60
- Eurogamer — 60
- VG247 — 60
Very low grades
- Shacknews — 50
- Critical Hits — 45
What is the story of the game?

The story of Crimson Desert follows Kliff, leader of a mercenary group called the Grey Manes, in a world marked by conflict and instability. After suffering a devastating betrayal that results in the destruction of his team at the hands of the Black Bears, commanded by Myurdin, he finds himself alone and driven by a desire for revenge.
Throughout the story, Kliff must rebuild alliances, confronting dangerous enemies and dealing with political disputes that directly influence the fate of the continent of Pywel. Meanwhile, a mysterious force known as the Abyss begins to affect the world, bringing even greater threats and altering the balance of the regions.
The narrative features a protagonist with complex motivations, far from a traditional hero, while blending war, intrigue, and supernatural elements in a dark fantasy setting, focusing on a campaign centered on the unfolding events.
Ultimately, Crimson Desert's score accurately summarizes the current situation: a game with a positive average, but one that doesn't achieve unanimous acclaim. And you, have you played this new game that just arrived?




